ABELSON v. BOSEM, 336 So.2d 482 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1976)

SARI ABELSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND SARI ABELSON, AS A SURVIVING DIRECTOR AND TRUSTEE FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NEW FLORIDIAN HOTEL, INC., A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. ARIE LIONEL BOSEM, A/K/A LIONEL BOSEM, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Nos. 75-547, 75-550.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 27, 1976. Rehearing Denied September 8, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Alan Schwartz, Judge.

Heller Kaplan, Miami, for appellant.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson Ward, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings these consolidated appeals from a final judgment, entered by the trial court after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint with prejudice and reserving jurisdiction over appellees’, defendants below, counterclaim.

It is well settled that, where a case is tried before a court without the intervention

Page 483

of a jury, the conclusions reached by the trial court on questions of fact or questions relating to the credibility of witnesses have the weight of a jury verdict. Such conclusions come to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed on appeal where they are supported by substantial competent evidence. See, e.g., Huwer v. Huwer, Fla.App. 1965, 175 So.2d 242; Paul’s Drugs, Inc. v. Southern Bell Tel. Tel. Co., Fla. App. 1965, 175 So.2d 203 Highland Lakes, Inc. v. Art Present Real Estate, Inc., Fla. App. 1962, 147 So.2d 348; Lowery v. Rosenberg, Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 321; and 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals §§ 314, 316, and 346.

We have considered the record, all points in the briefs, and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited, the final judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.