ADAMS v. ADAMS, 374 So.2d 29 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1979)

MARTHA SUE ADAMS, APPELLANT, v. JAMES K. ADAMS, APPELLEE.

No. 79-765.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 10, 1979. Rehearing Denied September 6, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, G. Milton Rubin, J.

Page 30

Pennington, Wilkinson, Gary Dunlap and Everett P. Anderson, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Ferrell Ferrell, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this domestic relations matter, the parties were divorced in 1975. The mother was given custody of the minor child, who is now five years old. The husband was ordered to pay support. She moved to Tallahassee, placed the child in the custody of her parents, and directed the father to make the support payments direct to her parents.

The father subsequently remarried and, in 1979, filed a petition to modify the original custody order in the original divorce proceedings in Dade County. The mother filed a motion to change venue to Leon County, her present residence and the place of residence of the minor child. The trial judge denied the change of venue.

Counsel for the appellant recognizes that normally matters of a change of custody in this type of proceedings go back to the court that originally entered same. Poliak v. Poliak, 235 So.2d 512
(Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Elliott v. Weyman, 337 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). His principal complaint is that the lady is indigent and that the Uniform Child Custody Act, enacted in 1977, should apply to intrastate proceedings as well as interstate proceedings. The express language of the statute, Section 61.1304, Florida Statutes (1977), specifically indicates that the law is applicable only to interstate custody squabbles and not to intrastate. Therefore, we find no merit in this argument.

As to the question of indigency, the trial court has the power upon proper petition to provide the mother with suit money and attorney’s fees to defend any modification order. Wilner v. Wilner, 167 So.2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1977).

Therefore, the order denying a change of venue is affirmed.

Affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 374 So.2d 29

Recent Posts

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-03 (Oct. 20, 2025)

State Attorney Staff Firearm Possession in Courtrooms Number: AGO 2025-03 Issued: October 20, 2025 Ed…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-02 (Oct. 20, 2025)

Certain Professional Firearm Regulations after McDaniels Number: AGO 2025-02 Issued: October 20, 2025 The Honorable…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2025-01 (June 11, 2025)

Moving the dates of Municipal Elections absent voter approval Number: AGO2025-01 Issued: June 11, 2025…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-04 (10/30/2023)

Sunshine Law – Search and Selection Committees Number: AGO2023-04 Issued October 30, 2023 Rachel Kamoutsas…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-03 (10/02/2023)

Firearms - Definitions Number: AGO2023-03 Issued October 02, 2023 Representative Shane Abbott Florida House of…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2023-02 (07/21/2023)

Clerk’s sale of court-ordered debts to debt purchasers Number: AGO 2023-02 Issued July 21, 2023…

1 year ago