Mr. Robert D. Klausner General Counsel

Attorney General of Florida — Opinion
November 15, 1993

RE: MUNICIPAL FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION TRUST FUND — MUNICIPAL POLICE OFFICERS’ RETIREMENT TRUST FUND — MUNICIPALITIES — LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS — PUBLIC OFFICIALS — authority of board of trustees of a firefighters’ and police officers’ trust fund to establish their own system for reimbursement of expenses and per diem. ss. 112.061, 175.061, 175.071, 185.05 and 185.06, F.S.

Municipal Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General

Mr. Robert D. Klausner General Counsel for the Key West Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Retirement Plan 6565 Taft Street, Suite 200 Hollywood, Florida 33024

Dear Mr. Klausner:

On behalf of the Key West Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Retirement Plan, you ask substantially the following question:

May the trustees of a municipal firefighters’ and police officers’ retirement fund established pursuant to Chs. 175 and 185, F.S., establish their own system for reimbursement of expenses incurred by trustees in the performance of their duties?

In sum:

The trustees of a firefighters’ and police officers’ retirement fund established under Chs. 175 and 185, F.S., must follow the reimbursement system established by the Legislature in s. 112.061, F.S.

You state that the Key West Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Retirement Plan was created pursuant to the Charter and Code of the City of Key West and Chs. 175 and 185, F.S. For purposes of this opinion, it is assumed that the retirement fund is a “chapter plan” and, therefore, subject to the provisions of Chs. 175 and 185, F.S.[1]

Chapters 175 and 185, F.S., create a uniform pension and retirement system for firefighters and police officers in each municipality and establish minimum standards for the operation and funding of firefighters’ pension trust funds and police officers’ retirement trust funds.[2] Section 175.061(2), F.S., creating a board of trustees to administer each municipal firefighters’ pension trust fund, states that “[t]he trustees shall not receive any compensation as such, but may receive expenses and per diem as provided by law.” (e.s.) Identical language is contained in s. 185.05(2), F.S., creating a board of trustees to administer each municipal police officers’ retirement trust fund. These are the only provisions relating to the payment of compensation, expenses and per diem for the trustees of a chapter plan controlled by the provisions of Chs. 175 and 185, F.S.

The term “by law” has been construed to mean a statute adopted by both houses of the Legislature.[3] Thus, the trustees of trust funds governed by the provisions in Chs. 175 and 185, F.S., must follow the provisions of state law relating to expenses and per diem.[4] The statutory provisions relating to travel expenses and per diem for public officers, employees and authorized persons are contained in s. 112.061, F.S.

Accordingly, it is my opinion that the Board of Trustees of the Key West Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Retirement Plan, has no authority to establish its own system for reimbursement of expenses and per diem for trustees in the performance of their duties, but are bound by the provisions of s. 112.061, F.S.

Sincerely,

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General

RAB/tls

[1] See, Florida League of Cities, Inc. v. Department of Insurance and Treasurer, 540 So.2d 850, 853 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1989).
[2] See, ss. 175.021 and 185.01, F.S.
[3] See, Advisory Opinion to Governor, 22 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1945) (ordinance of noncharter county not a “law” within the purview of s. 5[c], Art. II, State Const.); AGO 84-39 (municipal ordinance not a “law” within the meaning of s. 8, Art. I, State Const.); AGO 79-109 (governing body of charter county prohibited in absence of statutory authorization from providing by ordinance for imposition of civil penalties by agencies of county); and Broward County v. Plantation Imports, Inc. 419 So.2d 1145 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1982) (holding that provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion reached in AGO 79-109).
[4] See, AGO 92-35 (Jacksonville Police Officers and Firefighters Pension Board of Trustees bound by the provisions of s. 112.061, F.S.) and AGO 89-90 (trust fund created pursuant to Ch. 185, F.S., subject to provisions of that chapter).
jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 93-82

Recent Posts

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-03 (Oct. 20, 2025)

State Attorney Staff Firearm Possession in Courtrooms Number: AGO 2025-03 Issued: October 20, 2025 Ed…

2 months ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-02 (Oct. 20, 2025)

Certain Professional Firearm Regulations after McDaniels Number: AGO 2025-02 Issued: October 20, 2025 The Honorable…

2 months ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2025-01 (June 11, 2025)

Moving the dates of Municipal Elections absent voter approval Number: AGO2025-01 Issued: June 11, 2025…

2 months ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-04 (10/30/2023)

Sunshine Law – Search and Selection Committees Number: AGO2023-04 Issued October 30, 2023 Rachel Kamoutsas…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-03 (10/02/2023)

Firearms - Definitions Number: AGO2023-03 Issued October 02, 2023 Representative Shane Abbott Florida House of…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2023-02 (07/21/2023)

Clerk’s sale of court-ordered debts to debt purchasers Number: AGO 2023-02 Issued July 21, 2023…

1 year ago