AGO 98-27

Attorney General of Florida — Opinion
March 31, 1998

RE: MUNICIPALITIES — CHARTERS — period in which signatures on charter amendment petition valid. s. 166.031(1), Fla. Stat.

Municipal charter amendment, petition signatures

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General

Mr. Gordon B. Linn Pompano Beach City Attorney Post Office Box 2083 Pompano Beach, Florida 33061

Dear Mr. Linn:

On behalf of the city commission, your office asks substantially the following question:

Is there a time limitation on the collection of voters’ signatures for a petition to amend the city charter pursuant to section 166.031(1), Florida Statutes?[1]

In sum:

As section 166.031(1), Florida Statutes, requires a petition to amend a city charter to have signatures of ten percent of the registered electors as of the last preceding municipal general election, a reasonable construction of the statute is that signatures are valid for two years. It would be advisable, however, to seek legislative clarification.

You note that several statutes providing for citizen initiatives prescribe the length of time that the signatures on such an initiative petition remain valid. For example, section 100.371(2), Florida Statutes, governing petitions to amend the Florida Constitution, limits the validity of signatures on such petitions to four years.[2] Section 100.361(1), Florida Statutes, which prescribes the procedures for municipal recall elections, requires that “[a]ll signatures shall be obtained within a period of 30 days, and the petition [for recall] shall be filed within 30 days after the date the first signature is obtained on the petition.”

Section 166.031(1), Florida Statutes, however, in setting forth the method for amending municipal charters, states:

“The governing body of a municipality may, by ordinance, or the electors of a municipality may, by petition signed by 10 percent of the registered electors as of the last preceding municipal general election, submit to the electors of said municipality a proposed amendment to its charter, which amendment may be to any part or to all of said charter except that part describing the boundaries of such municipality. The governing body of the municipality shall place the proposed amendment contained in the ordinance or petition to a vote of the electors at the next general election held within the municipality or at a special election called for such purpose.”[3] (e.s.)

It is a paramount rule of statutory construction that the legislative intent and purpose behind the enactment of the statute must be determined and effectuated.[4] The purpose of the statute is to enable the electors of the municipality to place an amendment to the charter on the ballot. Such intent, however, would be frustrated if the signatures on a petition were to remain valid indefinitely since the signatories may no longer be electors of the municipality.

By requiring signatures of ten percent of the registered electors in the last municipal election in order to place the petition on the ballot, the statute appears to contemplate that such signatures will not be valid indefinitely. Since general elections are usually held every two years and the statute bases the required number of signatures on the last municipal general election, I am of the opinion that, until this matter is legislatively or judicially clarified, it is reasonable to conclude that the signatures on a petition to amend a municipal charter pursuant to section 166.031, Florida Statutes, would be valid for period of two years. I would, however, suggest that the Legislature revisit the statute and clarify its intent.

Sincerely,

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General

RAB/tjw