BANCO LATINO INTERNATIONAL v. PADIAL, 729 So.2d 483 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1999)

BANCO LATINO INTERNATIONAL, Appellant, vs. JUAN CARLOS PADIAL, Appellee.

No. 98-2398District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed March 24, 1999. JANUARY TERM, 1999

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Margarita Esquiroz, Judge; L.T. No. 97-13648.

Miller, Cassidy, Larroca Lewin, David S. Cohen and Joshua M. Flum (Washington, D.C.); Akerman, Senterfitt Eidson and Jonathan Goodman, for appellant.

Alvarez, Armas Borron and J. Alfredo De Armas, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Page 484

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of partial final summary judgment in favor of Juan Carlos Padial where the terms of the underlying employment agreement were clear and unambiguous. As such, the trial court properly applied the contract’s definition of the term “consideration” when calculating Padial’s commissions.

Affirmed.