BELCHER v. JOHNSON, 834 So.2d 422 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 2003)

JOHN BELCHER and LEESA BELCHER, Petitioners, v. PATRICIA JOHNSON, as guardian of HARRIET L. ROBERTS, a/k/a HENRIETTA L. ROBERTS, an incapacitated person, Respondent.

Case No. 2D02-2497District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed January 17, 2003.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; David Seth Walker, Judge.

Timothy W. Weber of Battaglia, Ross, Dicus Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Petitioners.

Thomas G. Tripp, Pinellas Park, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

John and Leesa Belcher petition this court for a writ of certiorari to quash a protective order. The Belchers sought to take the deposition of Harriet L. Roberts, who is an elderly woman suffering from a level of dementia. Her guardian, Patricia Johnson, filed a motion for protective order seeking to prevent the deposition because Ms. Roberts is, to some degree, legally incapacitated. The trial court granted the protective order without an evidentiary hearing and without making a factual determination that Ms. Roberts should be disqualified to testify as a witness under section 90.603, Florida Statutes (2000). Apparently, the trial court assumed that Ms. Roberts’ incapacity for purposes of a guardianship proceeding rendered her disqualified to testify as a matter of law. Florida law, however, only disqualifies a witness under specific circumstances. See § 90.603. Under the established law, even a person who has been declared insane can be found competent to testify.See Fla. Power Light Co. v. Robinson, 68 So.2d 406, 413 (Fla. 1953).

Although an order denying discovery may rarely qualify for review by certiorari, we conclude that Ms. Roberts’ advanced age and deteriorating mental status render this a case in which review on appeal cannot provide an adequate remedy. Accordingly, we quash the protective order

Page 423

and remand to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Ms. Roberts should be disqualified from testifying pursuant to section 90.603.

Petition for writ of certiorari granted.

ALTENBERND, SALCINES, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-03 (Oct. 20, 2025)

State Attorney Staff Firearm Possession in Courtrooms Number: AGO 2025-03 Issued: October 20, 2025 Ed…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-02 (Oct. 20, 2025)

Certain Professional Firearm Regulations after McDaniels Number: AGO 2025-02 Issued: October 20, 2025 The Honorable…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2025-01 (June 11, 2025)

Moving the dates of Municipal Elections absent voter approval Number: AGO2025-01 Issued: June 11, 2025…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-04 (10/30/2023)

Sunshine Law – Search and Selection Committees Number: AGO2023-04 Issued October 30, 2023 Rachel Kamoutsas…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-03 (10/02/2023)

Firearms - Definitions Number: AGO2023-03 Issued October 02, 2023 Representative Shane Abbott Florida House of…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2023-02 (07/21/2023)

Clerk’s sale of court-ordered debts to debt purchasers Number: AGO 2023-02 Issued July 21, 2023…

1 year ago