BELMARK RESTAURANT v. HOOKER, 220 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1969)

BELMARK RESTAURANT AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS, v. CLORA HOOKER AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.

No. 38262.Supreme Court of Florida.
March 26, 1969.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Donald V. Bulleit, of Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey
Trenam, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.

Leslie D. Franklin, of Earle, Jones, Chambers Franklin, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 7, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the sum of $250.00 to respondent-Clora Hooker’s attorney.

ERVIN, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Page 625