FISHER v. FISHER, 344 So.2d 1291 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1977)

HAROLD C. FISHER, APPELLANT, v. CAROLE R. FISHER, APPELLEE.

No. 77-327.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 12, 1977. Rehearing Denied May 11, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Herbert Stettin, J.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, for appellant.

Law Offices of Onett-Colodny, North Miami, by Joel S. Fass, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found that an oral stipulation placed in the record by the attorneys for the parties in the absence of their clients which anticipated that the parties would sign a full settlement contract could

Page 1292

not be enforced against a client who testified that she had not authorized the settlement. The finding of fact that the client had not authorized or agreed to the settlement is supported by sufficient evidence in this record to call for an affirmance in this court. See Town of Medley v. McCahill, 164 So.2d 541
(Fla. 3d DCA 1964); and Heath v. First National Bank in Milton, 213 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968).

Affirmed.