FLOWERS v. STATE, 812 So.2d 474 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 2002)

LAWRENCE FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D01-4641.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 6, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 17, 2002.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Larry Schack, Judge; L.T. Case No. 88-1283.

Lawrence Flowers, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of petitioner’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion which raised the claims previously raised and rejected by the circuit court in two prior motions to correct sentence. The circuit court’s rulings were affirmed by this court i Flowers v. State, 766 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and Flowers v. State, 688 So.2d 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Any future pro se petition or appeal raising the same issues previously resolved in this court will constitute an abuse of the judicial system, for which sanctions may be imposed. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346, 347
(Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1999).