No. 78-1000.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 19, 1978.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.
Page 442
G.E. Petrie, Jr., Coconut Grove, Mona Frommell, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan O’Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellants are an infant daughter, who brought suit through her natural father and next friend, and the father, individually. The father and daughter appeal a judgment of the trial court holding that the daughter (pedestrian) and her father, the plaintiffs, are not entitled to recover the deductible portion of personal injury protection benefits from the defendant insurer of a tort-feasor.
The basic facts are not in dispute. The father took out an automobile insurance policy on his own car. This policy had a $2,000 personal injury protection deductible provision. His young daughter was a pedestrian when hit by a car insured by the appellee Prudential Property Casualty Insurance Company. Prudential paid the father its liability limits of $15,000. The father and daughter then brought this action against Prudential to recover the $2,000 personal injury protection section of the father’s policy. The trial court ruled that Section 627.739,[1]
Florida Statutes (1977), precluded recovery by the father on behalf of his daughter of the $2,000 deductible portion of personal injury protection benefits.
The appellants, having failed to show any reason that the statute does not apply, we find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.