No. 93-03796.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 16, 1994.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, Durand J. Adams, J.
Page 574
PER CURIAM.
James Patterson appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Of the several grounds raised in the motion, only one requires further consideration by the circuit court. The remaining issues raised in the motion are without merit and the circuit court properly denied relief as to those.
Patterson contends that he is serving a 50-year sentence for second degree murder with a firearm, that is, a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum. Documents contained in the record appear to confirm the claim. If use of a firearm was alleged in the charging instrument and was proven at trial, Patterson’s offense constitutes a life felony. See §775.087(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); State v. Whitehead, 472 So.2d 730
(Fla. 1985); White v. State, 589 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, since the sentencing court opted to impose a term of years rather than a life sentence, it was limited to forty years. § 775.082(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); Greenhalgh v. State, 582 So.2d 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).[1]
After remand the trial court may again deny the motion if the files and records in this case demonstrate that Patterson was not charged with or convicted of a life felony. However, if Patterson is correct about his sentence, he is entitled to have it corrected. If the court finds that Patterson was convicted of and sentenced for a life felony, it should also delete any reference to the habitual offender statute. Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435
(Fla. 1992).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.