Categories: Florida Court Opinions

PERRY v. YOUNG, 444 So.2d 553 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1984)

LEROY B. PERRY, EDITH STURM, JAMES PERRY, MARY EICHINGER, DORIS R. GRILLO, AND DONALD A. PERRY, APPELLANTS, v. LLOYD EDWARD YOUNG, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF EVELYN M. WISE, DECEASED, LLOYD EDWARD YOUNG, AND CATHERINE M. YOUNG, APPELLEES.

No. 83-1106.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 25, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; W.C. Johnson, Judge.

Page 554

Rusley C. Meeker of Hallman, Meeker, Keeley Furr, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Robert A. Urban and Bennett Oppenheimer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by competent, substantial evidence and that any error made by the court in stating the grounds for its decision was harmless. See generally, Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp., 421 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) and In re Estate of Hammermann, 387 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly, the judgment is hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

jdjungle