POSEY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 125 So.2d 108 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1960)

EDSEL POSEY, APPELLANT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND A. BRUCE CARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS PENSACOLA TRACTOR COMPANY, APPELLEES.

No. C-237.District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 8, 1960.

Appeal from the Court of Record of Escambia County.

Merritt, Jackson, Anderson Henderson, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert P. Gaines and Henry R. Barksdale, of Hahn and Barksdale, Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We are confronted with a motion of appellee Ford Motor Company to quash this appeal on grounds that it is frivolous and in support thereof appellee asserts that appellant has failed to argue any of his assignments of error and has therefore abandoned them.

The record on appeal has not been filed in this court nor is it due under the rule (Rule 3.6, subd. j(1) F.A.R., 31 F.S.A.). All that is before this court is the notice of appeal, the appellant’s brief and appellee’s motion, which is not supported by any portion of the record by which the propriety of the motion can be determined. Specifically, the record here does not contain a copy of the assignments of error.

While we find that appellant’s brief does not make an appropriate reference to the assignments of error upon which the statement of questions involved on appeal is predicated, as required by Rule 3.7, subd. f(4), F.A.R., the questions stated and the argument addressed clearly infer that the assignments of error are directed to bring about a review of the action of the trial court in dismissing appellant’s complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. In that aspect of the situation and considering appellee’s failure to provide this court with the necessary documents required to intelligently act on the motion, we are not inclined at this stage to visit upon appellant the harsh relief sought by the motion.

Page 109

The motion to quash is denied, without prejudice to renew it upon an appropriate showing.

WIGGINTON, C.J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-03 (Oct. 20, 2025)

State Attorney Staff Firearm Possession in Courtrooms Number: AGO 2025-03 Issued: October 20, 2025 Ed…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2025-02 (Oct. 20, 2025)

Certain Professional Firearm Regulations after McDaniels Number: AGO 2025-02 Issued: October 20, 2025 The Honorable…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2025-01 (June 11, 2025)

Moving the dates of Municipal Elections absent voter approval Number: AGO2025-01 Issued: June 11, 2025…

1 month ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-04 (10/30/2023)

Sunshine Law – Search and Selection Committees Number: AGO2023-04 Issued October 30, 2023 Rachel Kamoutsas…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO2023-03 (10/02/2023)

Firearms - Definitions Number: AGO2023-03 Issued October 02, 2023 Representative Shane Abbott Florida House of…

1 year ago

Florida Attorney General Opinion No. AGO 2023-02 (07/21/2023)

Clerk’s sale of court-ordered debts to debt purchasers Number: AGO 2023-02 Issued July 21, 2023…

1 year ago