No. 5D10-1475.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 6, 2011.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, J.
Page 557
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Colby Nicole Ferris, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Megan Saillant, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
LAWSON, J.
Patricia L. Pralle appeals from the denial of her motion to withdraw plea after sentencing. Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion, we reverse and remand with directions that the motion to withdraw plea be granted.
Pralle was charged with one count of grand theft for stealing a motor vehicle, another count of grand theft for stealing jewelry, and a count of petit theft for stealing less than $100 in cash. The victim in each count was Pralle’s paternal grandmother, who also served as Pralle’s legal guardian.[1] Pralle’s criminal punishment scoresheet reflects no prior criminal record, and Pralle did not face a mandatory term of incarceration.
On February 22, 2010, Pralle entered a negotiated plea with an overall sentencing cap of seven years in state prison, with no reference to any probationary period that might extend the overall sentence beyond the seven-year cap. At sentencing, the defense requested that the court sentence Pralle to juvenile sanctions that would include psychological and drug treatment.[2] The State agreed that Pralle “need[ed] dual diagnosis help,” adding that: “I think that is what’s in every one of the reports. She needs long-term inpatient help.”[3] The State’s recommendation echoed comments from the victim that she only wanted Pralle to get the help that she needed and asked that Pralle be allowed to “come home.”
The trial judge, however, announced that he had decided to structure “something different than the seven-year-capped sentenced that I had — that I had offered,” and instead imposed a sentence of five years in state prison to be followed by five years of probation. Pralle moved to with
Page 558
draw her plea when the overall sentence exceeded the cap promised to induce her, plea, but the trial court denied the motion.
On appeal, the State appears to concede error based upon Echeverria v. State, 949 So.2d 331vtFla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that a defendant must be permitted to withdraw his or her plea where the trial court accepts a plea and then imposes a sentence in excess of any negotiated sentence cap contained in the plea agreement). Acknowledging Echeverria as controlling, the State simply requests that we “rule as justice requires.”
Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that Pralle be permitted to withdraw her plea.
REVERSED and REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
TORPY and COHEN, J J., concur.
State Attorney Staff Firearm Possession in Courtrooms Number: AGO 2025-03 Issued: October 20, 2025 Ed…
Certain Professional Firearm Regulations after McDaniels Number: AGO 2025-02 Issued: October 20, 2025 The Honorable…
Moving the dates of Municipal Elections absent voter approval Number: AGO2025-01 Issued: June 11, 2025…
Sunshine Law – Search and Selection Committees Number: AGO2023-04 Issued October 30, 2023 Rachel Kamoutsas…
Firearms - Definitions Number: AGO2023-03 Issued October 02, 2023 Representative Shane Abbott Florida House of…
Clerk’s sale of court-ordered debts to debt purchasers Number: AGO 2023-02 Issued July 21, 2023…