Categories: Florida Court Opinions

S.C.H. REALTY v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEV., 460 So.2d 1031 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1985)

S.C.H. REALTY, INC., APPELLANT, v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEVELOPMENT CORP., C. ROBERT CUSICK, L. RONALD CAPOZZOLI AND RICHARD VAZZA, EDWARD J. DEBARTOLO, APPELLEE.

No. 84-1153.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
January 2, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Rhea Pincus Grossman, J.

Page 1032

Lapidus Stettin and Richard Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.

Smith Mandler and Mitchell Mandler and Patricia M. Silver, Miami Beach, Wright Carauana, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment against appellant, S.C.H. Realty, Inc. [S.C.H.] upon a finding that seller-principal, South Bayshore Development Corporation [South Bayshore], is not liable to subagentbroker S.C.H. in light of the undisputed evidence in the record indicating that South Bayshore neither directly contracted with S.C.H. to retain its services nor authorized or ratified the employment of S.C.H. Whidden v. Morse, 213 So.2d 625
(Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.

jdjungle