Green v. Mcneil. No. SC09-670.Supreme Court of Florida. September 11, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D08-5168, 08-61CA. Petitioner’s “Motion for Rehearing/Clarification” is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Articles Tagged: 18 So.3d 1037
DAUPHINAIS v. McNEIL, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Dauphinais v. Mcneil. No. SC09-491.Supreme Court of Florida. September 11, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D07-3813, 01-CF-15277. Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
BELCHER v. STATE, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Belcher v. State. No. SC09-1150.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D06-2049, 04-2049. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it should decline to […]
DONALDSON v. STATE, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Donaldson v. State. No. SC09-448.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). CR82-225. The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis is apparent […]
FERGUSON v. STATE, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Ferguson v. State. No. SC09-827.Supreme Court of Florida. September 11, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D08-3240, 03-10458. Petitioner’s “Motion for Rehearing Reconsideration and Clarification of Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
GRIMSLEY v. McNEIL, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Grimsley v. Mcneil. No. SC09-1331.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 90-2048, 90-2049, 90-2050, 96-1003. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, […]
ELLIOTT v. STATE, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Elliott v. State. No. SC09-1165.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D08-3465, 06-CF-002064. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it should decline to […]
FABING v. EATON, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Fabing v. Eaton. No. SC09-1003.Supreme Court of Florida. September 10, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 06-CA-5453, 07-CA-14647, 07-CA-15723. The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied as successive See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 1975) (declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition […]
FRALEY v. McNEIL, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Fraley v. McNeil. No. SC09-1347.Supreme Court of Florida. September 8, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). SC09-1347. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and […]
BOARD OF COUNTY COMM’RS v. BROCK, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Board of County Comm’rs of Collier County v. Brock. No. SC09-581.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D08-3126, 07-1056-CA. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having […]
BODDIE v. McNEIL, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Boddie v. McNeil. No. SC09-898.Supreme Court of Florida. September 9, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 94-10958-CF. To the extent that petitioner seeks a new trial, the Court has determined that relief is not authorized and therefore, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). To the extent that petitioner […]
CAREW v. STATE, 18 So.3d 1037 (Fla. 2009)
Carew v. State. No. SC09-1621.Supreme Court of Florida. September 10, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D08-1396, CF07-003940-XX. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court.