THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. DOUGLAS LIDDELL KIRKLAND, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-711.Supreme Court of Florida. April 20, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2010-31,250(05A)CES. The Petition for Emergency Suspension filed pursuant to Rule 3-5.2 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar is approved and it is hereby ordered that the respondent is suspended from the practice of […]
Articles Tagged: 36 So.3d 85
STABAK v. TROPICAL BREEZE ESTATE, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
ROBERT STABAK, Petitioner(s) v. TROPICAL BREEZE ESTATE, INC., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-460.Supreme Court of Florida. April 22, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D09-2879, 502007CA010420XX. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed on the Court’s own motion based on petitioner’s failure to timely submit the filing fee or a proper motion for leave to proceed […]
FLORIDA BAR v. RICE, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. DEBORAH K. RICE, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-25.Supreme Court of Florida. April 29, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2009-50,774(15A)FFC. The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is disbarred with leave to reapply after five years. Respondent is currently suspended, therefore the disbarment is effective nunc pro tunc January 11, […]
FLORIDA BAR v. McDOWELL, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. THOMAS F. McDOWELL SHOEMAKER Respondent(s). Case No. SC09-1697.Supreme Court of Florida. April 22, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2009-00,089(4A). The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is suspended from the practice of law for ten days, effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent […]
FLORIDA BAR, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s), RE: BARRY KUTUN, Respondent(s). Case No. SC09-2021.Supreme Court of Florida. April 27, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2010-70,532(11A-MRE). The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is reinstated effective immediately under the terms and conditions set forth in the report. Respondent is further placed on probation for three years effective […]
THE FLORIDA BAR v. KATZ, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
The Florida Bar v. Katz (Jay). No. SC10-70.Supreme Court of Florida. April 29, 2010. Florida Decisions Without Published Opinions Suspended
FLORIDA BAR v. GRAINER, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. JILL BETH NEWMAN, Respondent(s). Case No. SC09-37.Supreme Court of Florida. April 23, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2008-50,382(15E), 2008-50,586(15E). Upon consideration of the report of the referee, the conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, The Florida Bar’s response to this Court’s order dated July 29, 2009, the filing of the revised […]
STATE v. AKINS, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
State v. Akins. No. SC10-896.Supreme Court of Florida. June 10, 2010. Appeal from the 2nd DCA ___ So.3d ___. Florida Decisions Without Published Opinions Rev.gr.
SWALLICK v. McNEIL, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
STEPHEN SWALLICK, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. McNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s). Case No. SC09-2315.Supreme Court of Florida. April 27, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 05-2008-CF-030780-AX. The Court having considered petitioner’s response to the Court’s order to show cause dated December 15, 2009, this case is hereby dismissed. See Johnson v. State, 974 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2008); Logan […]
FLORIDA BAR v. BARR, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. BRUCE EDGAR BARR, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-736.Supreme Court of Florida. April 29, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2009-51,502(17J). The unconditional guilty plea and disbarment on consent are approved and respondent is disbarred, effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent can close out his practice and protect […]
FLORIDA BAR v. GRIFFITH, 36 So.3d 85 (Fla. 2010)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. ALLAN THOMAS GRIFFITH, Respondent(s). Case No. SC09-1978.Supreme Court of Florida. April 22, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2009-10,033(20A). The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is suspended from the practice of law for ten days, effective thirty days from the date of this order so that Respondent can […]