FRAZIER v. STATE, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

BENSON DOUGLAS FRAZIER, Petitioner(s) v. STATEFLORIDA, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1700.Supreme Court of Florida. September 1, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-2836, 16-1991-CF-7537-AX. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be entertained […]

Read More

FRAZIER v. STATE, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

BENSON DOUGLAS FRAZIER, Petitioner(s) v. STATEFLORIDA, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1700.Supreme Court of Florida. September 1, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-2836, 16-1991-CF-7537-AX. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be entertained […]

Read More

BROOKS v. STATE, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

ANDRES BROOKS, Petitioner(s) v. STATEFLORIDA, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-555.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D00-1976, 00-4198. Petitioner’s “Motion for Reconsideration,” treated as a motion for rehearing, is hereby denied. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Read More

BROWN v. McNEIL, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

LYNWALL v. BROWN, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. McNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1027.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 95-420. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other requests for relief […]

Read More

BEDASEE v. FREMONT INVESTMENT, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

OWEN BEDASEE, ET AL., Petitioner(s) v. FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN CO., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-538.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D09-2995, 08-1277-CA. Because petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is […]

Read More

HANSEN v. CITYDELAND, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

ROY HANSEN, ET AL., Petitioner(s) v. CITYDELAND, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-867.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D09-669, 2006-10764-C1DL, 2006-10765-C1DL. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court […]

Read More

CAMPBELL v. McNEIL, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

LESTER K. CAMPBELL, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. McNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-912.Supreme Court of Florida. August 27, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 07-15590. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Read More

JAX v. FL UNPLMT APPEALS MM., 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

RONALD JAX, Petitioner(s) v. FL UNPLMT APP , ET AL., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-816.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-568, 009-08997. Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby […]

Read More

BLACK v. VANGUARD VILLAGE, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

CLINTON BLACK, Petitioner(s) v. VANGUARD VILLAGE #15 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1721.Supreme Court of Florida. September 3, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D10-2956, 10-2807CA. Having determined that this Court is without jurisdiction, this case is hereby dismissed. See Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. […]

Read More

BENOIT v. STATE, 44 So.3d 1177 (Fla. 2010)

JEANNINE BENOIT O/B/O JOSEPH BENOIT, Petitioner(s) v. STATEFLORIDA, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-761.Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2010. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed because petitioner raises the same issues as in Benoit v. State, No. SC09-1424, which was transferred to the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit in and […]

Read More