SOLOMON v. STATE, SHERMAN SOLOMON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FL, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1736.Supreme Court of Florida. September 10, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D09-387, 562007CF004831A. Having considered this case under any or all of the jurisdictional bases described in Article V, Section 3(b)(3) and 3(b)(7)-(9), Florida Constitution, it appears that the Court is without jurisdiction. […]
Articles Tagged: 46 So.3d 48
SMITH v. STATE, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
Smith v. State. No. SC10-1671.Supreme Court of Florida. September 17, 2010. Appeal from the 1st DCA 41 So.3d 221. Florida decisions without published opinios, Mand. dism.
FL BAR v. CAREY, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
FL BAR v. CAREY, THE FL BAR, Complainant(s) v. JACK S. CAREY, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1399.Supreme Court of Florida. September 14, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2009-10,235(6A). The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is disbarred, effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent can close out his practice […]
FL BAR v. CLARK, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
FL BAR v. CLARK, THE FL BAR, Complainant(s) v. MICHELLE H. CLARK, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-195.Supreme Court of Florida. September 15, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2010-90,088(09A), 2010-30,803(09A), 2010-31,268(09A), 2011-30,038(09A). The uncontested report of the referee is approved and respondent is suspended from the practice of law for six months, effective thirty days from the date […]
WIGGINS v. RUTHERFORD, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
WIGGINS v. RUTHERFORD, EDWIN WIGGINS, Petitioner(s) v. JOHN RUTHERFORD, SHERIFF, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1613.Supreme Court of Florida. September 14, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2010-MM-014608. Having received no response to this Court’s order to show cause dated August 19, 2010, this case is hereby dismissed as unauthorized, subject to reinstatement if petitioner demonstrates within fifteen days […]
PEREA v. STATE, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
DIEGO RODRIGO PEREA, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FL, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1052.Supreme Court of Florida. September 14, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D08-2434, 06-CF-14487. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court […]
STAFFORD v. STATE, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
TAFFORD v. STATE, IRA STAFFORD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FL, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1077.Supreme Court of Florida. September 20, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-1150, 2009CA0001081. The petition for review is hereby dismissed on the Court’s own motion based on petitioner’s failure to timely submit the filing fee or order of insolvency from the district court […]
THE FL BAR v. DORN (ROBERT), 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
The Florida Bar v. Dorn (Robert). No. SC10-1491.Supreme Court of Florida. September 17, 2010. Florida decisions without published opinios, Suspended.
SAYLOR v. STATE, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
SAYLOR v. STATE, JONATHON SAYLOR, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FL, Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1750.Supreme Court of Florida. September 13, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D10-711, 96-1184-CF-52. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Dodi Publishing Co. v. Editorial America, S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. […]
PAYLESS FLEA MARKET v. S I INVESTMENTS, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
PAYLESS FLEA MARKET, INC., ETC., Petitioner(s) v. S I INVESTMENTS, ET AL., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1356.Supreme Court of Florida. September 14, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D08-486, 04-14172 08, 05-17836 08. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, […]
WILLIAMS v. McNEIL, 46 So.3d 48 (Fla. 2010)
WILLIAMS v. McNEIL, ALFRED N. WILLIAMS, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. McNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s). Case No. SC10-1503.Supreme Court of Florida. September 10, 2010. Lower Tribunal No(s). 031993CF000090. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other […]