ADOLPHUS JORDAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC10-2152.Supreme Court of Florida. February 24, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). F08-17048. Having received no response to this Court’s order to show cause dated February 3, 2011, this case is hereby dismissed as unauthorized, subject to reinstatement if petitioner demonstrates within fifteen days from the date of […]
Articles Tagged: 56 So.3d 766
MATHIS v. RANSTAD U.S., 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
DENISE MATHIS, ET VIR, Petitioner(s) v. RANSTAD U.S., L.P., ET AL., Respondent(s). No. SC11-316.Supreme Court of Florida. February 16, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D09-3101, 07-5599. Having determined that this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the petition for writ of mandamus under any or all of the jurisdictional bases described in article V, section 3(b)(3) […]
LOFTIN v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
MICHAEL ALAN LOFTIN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC10-361.Supreme Court of Florida. February 17, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D07-2540, 2006-CF-458. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having […]
LEE v. BUSS, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
FRED LEE, JR., Petitioner(s) v. EDWIN G. BUSS, ETC., Respondent(s). No. SC10-2369.Supreme Court of Florida. February 17, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2004-CF-000700A. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed without prejudice to petitioner to seek relief in the appropriate circuit or district court. PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LAWTON v. SORRELLS, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
NORMAN H. LAWTON, Petitioner(s) v. NORMA J. SORRELLS, ET AL., Respondent(s). No. SC10-513.Supreme Court of Florida. February 22, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D09-4016, 01-5379FM. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the […]
ELLIS v. BUSS, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
KEITH ELLIS, Petitioner(s) v. EDWIN G. BUSS, ETC., Respondent(s). No. SC11-193.Supreme Court of Florida. February 17, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 97-469CFA. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also […]
KYSER v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
WALTER GRANT KYSER, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC10-2247.Supreme Court of Florida. February 24, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D 09-3932, 86-277-CF. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court […]
KNOWLES v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
BRIAN KNOWLES, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC11-122.Supreme Court of Florida. February 24, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D 10-682, 86-1886-CF10A, 86-2005CF10A. Having considered the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this Court as a petition filed under any or all of the jurisdictional bases described in Article V, Section 3(b)(3) and […]
MAYO v. SUGAR CANE GROWERS, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
VICTOR MAYO, Petitioner(s) v. SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., Respondent(s). No. SC10-881.Supreme Court of Florida. February 17, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-750, 08-033727MAD. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed as moot. Petitioner’s Renewed Motion for Appellate Attorney’s Fees and Costs is hereby denied. Any other motions or requests for […]
HOLLOWAY v. RUTHERFORD, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2009)
JOHNNY D. HOLLOWAY, Petitioner(s) v. JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, SHERIFF, Respondent(s). No. SC08-2186.Supreme Court of Florida. June 29, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). 16-2008-CF-10622-AX. Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.
JULES v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
JEAN J. JULES, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC11-343.Supreme Court of Florida. February 18, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D11-133, 89-2983. Having determined that this Court is without jurisdiction, this case is hereby dismissed. See Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
MACK v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2011)
STEVEN D. MACK, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC11-364.Supreme Court of Florida. February 22, 2011. Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D10-1794, 91-CF-187. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be […]
GREENHALGH v. STATE, 56 So.3d 766 (Fla. 2009)
MARK F. GREENHALGH, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC09-675.Supreme Court of Florida. June 25, 2009. Lower Tribunal No(s). CRC86-08265CFANO, 2D08-2738. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed. See Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court.