958 So.2d 920 Archives

RATH v. NETWORK MARKETING, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

MATTHIAS RATH, M.D., ET AL, Petitioner(s) v. NETWORK MARKETING, L.C., ETC., ET AL, Respondent(s). No. SC07-268.Supreme Court of Florida. May 4, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 4D06-3315. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, […]

SANCHEZ v. STATE, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

JESUS SANCHEZ, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC07-242.Supreme Court of Florida. May 18, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 3D04-104. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that […]

TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF CORRS., 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

RONALD DARRELL TAYLOR, Petitioner(s) v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent(s). No. SC07-584.Supreme Court of Florida. May 3, 2007. Lower Tribunal No.: 1D06-5974. Petitioner having filed a proper notice of dismissal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.350(b), it is ordered that the petition for review be and the same is hereby voluntarily dismissed.

ROSADO v. McDONOUGH, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

DAVID ROSADO, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, ETC., Respondent(s). No. SC07-690.Supreme Court of Florida. May 7, 2007. Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied. WELLS, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, […]

SOLIMAN v. CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

MAURICE SOLIMAN, Petitioner(s) v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL, Respondent(s). No. SC07-323.Supreme Court of Florida. May 4, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 1D06-4831. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and […]

SOLIMAN v. CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

PUBILLONES v. LYONS, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

LIETTY PUBILLONES, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES LYONS, Respondent(s). No. SC06-2501.Supreme Court of Florida. May 18, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 3D05-710. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it […]

STATE v. GRIFFIN, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner(s) v. KELLY LOUISE GRIFFIN, Respondent(s). No. SC07-397.Supreme Court of Florida. May 7, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 1D06-3154. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Certified Great Public Importance pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution (1980), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), and the Court having […]

RICH v. McDONOUGH, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

FRED F. RICH, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent(s). No. SC07-733.Supreme Court of Florida. May 23, 2007. To the extent that petitioner seeks review of claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 477, 478 (Fla. 1975) (declaring […]

SUTTON v. STATE, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

DAVID Q. SUTTON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC07-627.Supreme Court of Florida. May 14, 2007. Lower Tribunal Nos.: 00-38316, 00-39333. The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied. ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

LLOYD v. STATE, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

ORVEL W. LLOYD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC07-872.Supreme Court of Florida. May 17, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 1D06-4695. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed. See Jenkins v. State, 385 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by […]

SMITH v. ESTATE OF SMITH, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

JOSEPH SMITH, Petitioner(s) v. ESTATE OF HAROLD SMITH, Respondent(s). No. SC06-2135.Supreme Court of Florida. May 14, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 4D06-2404. Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and Supplements thereto are hereby denied. WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.

RIGGINS v. STATE, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

DARRYLE RIGGINS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC07-398.Supreme Court of Florida. May 14, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 3D05-694. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that […]

STRATTON v. McDONOUGH, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

RANDY STRATTON, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, ETC., Respondent(s). No. SC06-2531.Supreme Court of Florida. March 21, 2007. CORRECTED ORDER The “Motion for Leave to Correct Scribners [sic] Error” and “Motion for Leave to Amend Statement of Case/Heading” are hereby granted. The “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus/(Error) Coram Nobis Relief” is hereby denied as procedurally […]

NUVOX COMMS. v. EDGAR, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

NUVOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL, Appellant(s) v. LISA POLAK EDGAR, ETC., ET AL, Appellee(s). No. SC06-1828.Supreme Court of Florida. May 7, 2007. Lower Tribunal No. 060308-TP. NuVox Communications, Inc., Time Warner Telecom of Florida, L.P., XO Communications Services, Inc., Xspedius Management Co. Switched Services, LLC and Xspedius Management Co. of Jacksonville, LLC, competitive local exchange […]

MOTON v. McDONOUGH, 958 So.2d 920 (Fla. 2007)

LEWIS M. MOTON, JR., Petitioner(s) v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent(s). No. SC07-736.Supreme Court of Florida. May 23, 2007. Lower Tribunal Nos. 2005 CA 001674, 1D06-2114. The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 913 So.2d 541, 543-44 (Fla. 2005) (stating that “[i]n the present cases . […]