WARRINER v. CASA LOMA LAND CORP., 324 So.2d 675 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1975)

FRANCES OWEN WARRINER, A/K/A FRANCES O. WARRINER, APPELLANT, v. CASA LOMA LAND CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL., AND CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLEES.

No. 74-551.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 18, 1975. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; David Goodhart, Judge.

Frances Owen Warriner, in pro per.

Berkell Straus, Sue Rose Samuels, North Miami Beach, Terrell, Baisden, Peterson, Stanton Stillman, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the trial court sets forth its finding as follows:

* * * * * *
“. . . the identical claims and legal theories had been previously adjudicated by the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida and by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as evidenced by a brief filed by the Plaintiff as Appellant in the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 72-1550, which affirmatively and on its face demonstrates that there is nothing in the Amended Complaint which was not or could not have been raised, argued or urged by the Plaintiff in the previous litigation; and because there must be an end to the litigation (See Butler v. Bertram Co., 281 So.2d 227
(3rd D.C.A. 1973)) . . .”

* * * * * *
The record supports the finding. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.