Categories: Florida Court Opinions

WEISS v. COURSHON, 627 So.2d 604 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1993)

PATRICIA POLLAK WEISS AND THOMAS POLLAK, APPELLANTS, v. ARTHUR H. COURSHON AND JACK R. COURSHON, AS TRUSTEES OF A TRUST OF AARON COURSHON, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 93-866.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 7, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Norman S. Gerstein, Judge.

Patricia Pollak Weiss and Thomas Pollak, in pro. per.

Steel Hector Davis and Alvin B. Davis and Adalberto Jordan, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Pollak Weiss and Thomas Pollak appeal an order denying their motion to intervene. We entirely agree with the substance of the trial court’s ruling, which granted Weiss and Pollak certain notification rights, but denied them full party status. In light of the recent decision in Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1992), it is more accurate to say that the order under review is one which grants limited intervention. With that technical modification in terminology, we affirm the order under review. We emphasize that this change in terminology in the order does not confer on appellants any other or greater rights than those delineated in the trial court’s order.

Affirmed as modified.

jdjungle